Jane Burns

1.7k citations
33 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Burns

32 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jane Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Applied Psychology 296
  • Clinical Psychology 331
  • Social Psychology 221
  • Health 78
  • Speech and Hearing 58
Replace Oľga Orosová with:
Oľga Orosová Slovakia
John Petraitis United States
Linda Trudeau United States
Michael G. Ainette United States
David Pierce Australia
Jane Burns Australia
Dee Burton United States
Cheryl A. Presley United States
Zuzana Dankulincová Veselská Slovakia
Ole Melkevik Norway
Jane Burns relative to Oľga Orosová Slovakia Oľga Orosová's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Oľga Orosová · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Burns. The network helps show where Jane Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Burns Line = papers co-authored together Jane Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010196
2 2013194
3 2008102
4 200491
5 201769
6 200664
7 200761
8 201252
9
Social Environments and the Emotional Wellbeing of Young People
199848
10 201744
11 201642
12 201440
13 200439
14 201136
15 201130
16
Game on: exploring the impact of technologies on young men's mental health and wellbeing
201326
17 201426
18
Rethinking the Digital Divide: Findings from a Study of Marginalised Young People's ICT Use
200823
19 200820
20 201915

About Jane Burns

Jane Burns is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Education, Applied Psychology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (9 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (8 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (5 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (296 citations), Clinical Psychology (331 citations), Social Psychology (221 citations), Health (78 citations) and Speech and Hearing (58 citations). Jane Burns has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ian B. Hickie, Tracey A Davenport, Philippa Collin, Louise A. Ellis, Georgina Luscombe, Patrick J. Hurley, Danielle Clode, Marianne Webb, Michelle Blanchard and Alyssa Milton. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, JMIR Mental Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Interactive Technology and Smart Education and Early Intervention in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact