Mitchell Dowling
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 7
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 4
- Co-authors
- Debra Rickwood (5 shared papers)Timothy A. Carey (1 shared paper)Tracey A Davenport (5 shared papers)Ian B. Hickie (5 shared papers)Alyssa Milton (4 shared papers)Catherine Hungerford (1 shared paper)Anna Roberts (1 shared paper)Ashlea Hambleton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- JMIR Mental Health (2 papers)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Journal of Gambling Studies (1 paper)Journal of Technology in Human Services (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mitchell Dowling
12 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Applied Psychology 177
- Social Psychology 123
- Clinical Psychology 101
- General Health Professions 53
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Dowling
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Dowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Dowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Dowling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Dowling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Dowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Dowling. The network helps show where Mitchell Dowling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Dowling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 132 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 2 |
About Mitchell Dowling
Mitchell Dowling is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (177 citations), Social Psychology (123 citations), Clinical Psychology (101 citations), General Health Professions (53 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations). Mitchell Dowling has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Debra Rickwood, Timothy A. Carey, Tracey A Davenport, Ian B. Hickie, Alyssa Milton, Catherine Hungerford, Anna Roberts, Ashlea Hambleton, Jane Burns and Shane Cross. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR Mental Health, Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Gambling Studies and Journal of Technology in Human Services.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.