Anna Mackenzie

1.1k citations
12 papers · 756 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Mackenzie

12 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

Anna Mackenzie
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Applied Psychology 462
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 382
  • Clinical Psychology 263
  • Social Psychology 126
  • Sociology and Political Science 210
Replace Elisabeth Nilsson-Ihrfelt with:
Elisabeth Nilsson-Ihrfelt Sweden
Christina Späth Germany
Lise Bergman Nordgren Sweden
Kjersti Lillevoll Norway
Mats Dahlin Sweden
Marion Sommers‐Spijkerman Netherlands
Nicholas R. Forand United States
Daniel C. Kolubinski United Kingdom
Gabriela A. Nagy United States
Amanda L. Hyde United States
Anna Mackenzie relative to Elisabeth Nilsson-Ihrfelt Sweden Elisabeth Nilsson-Ihrfelt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Elisabeth Nilsson-Ihrfelt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Mackenzie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Mackenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Mackenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Mackenzie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Mackenzie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Mackenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Mackenzie. The network helps show where Anna Mackenzie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Mackenzie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Mackenzie Line = papers co-authored together Anna Mackenzie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2013259
2 2013146
3 2013125
4 201475
5 200757
6 201633
7 201728
8 201412
9 19838
10
Reach Out: online mental health promotion for young people
20097
11 20165
12 19661

About Anna Mackenzie

Anna Mackenzie is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (462 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (382 citations), Clinical Psychology (263 citations), Social Psychology (126 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (210 citations). Anna Mackenzie has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gavin Andrews, Alishia D. Williams, Sarah Watts, Louise Mewton, Jill M. Newby, Simon E. Blackwell, Emily A. Holmes, Jessica Smith, Nora Wong and Karen McIntyre. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Behaviour Research and Therapy, BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and BJPsych Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact