Jonathan Nicholas

687 citations
10 papers · 436 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Nicholas

10 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Jonathan Nicholas
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Applied Psychology 113
  • Clinical Psychology 181
  • Speech and Hearing 54
  • Social Psychology 124
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 27
Replace Neal Baer with:
Neal Baer United States
Linda Farris Kurtz United States
Andrea Greenblatt Canada
Michelle Ifill-Williams United States
Mária Bačíková-Slešková Slovakia
Joel Harvey United Kingdom
Sherilynn F. Spear United States
M. Ellen Mitchell United States
Magnhild Høie Norway
Gareth Furber Australia
Jonathan Nicholas relative to Neal Baer United States Neal Baer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Neal Baer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Nicholas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Nicholas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Nicholas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Nicholas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Nicholas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Nicholas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Nicholas. The network helps show where Jonathan Nicholas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Nicholas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Nicholas Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Nicholas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2006110
2 200980
3 200478
4 200757
5
Better dead than gay?: Depression, suicide ideation and attempt among a sample of gay and straight-identified males aged 18-24
199835
6 200633
7 201026
8 201414
9 20222
10 20221

About Jonathan Nicholas

Jonathan Nicholas is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (1 paper), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1 paper) and FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (113 citations), Clinical Psychology (181 citations), Speech and Hearing (54 citations), Social Psychology (124 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (27 citations). Jonathan Nicholas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Indonesia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philippa Collin, Matt O’Brien, Anna Mackenzie, Jane Burns, Michael Heller, Nilesh Patel, Gordon S. Smith, Jeanne L. Jacoby, James Reed and Helen Christensen. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Adolescent Health, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Perspectives in Public Health and Youth studies Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact