David Pierce

1.5k citations
51 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

David Pierce

47 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

David Pierce
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Clinical Psychology 548
  • Applied Psychology 99
  • Health 88
  • Social Psychology 186
  • Emergency Medicine 70
Replace Dominic Murphy with:
Dominic Murphy United Kingdom
Walter E. Penk United States
Adam Gerace Australia
Bobbie Ray-Sannerud United States
Heidi Cramm Canada
Stephen M. Saunders United States
Asha Z. Ivey-Stephenson United States
Marc I. Kruse United States
Stefan Cvetkovski Australia
Marie Dahlin Sweden
David Pierce relative to Dominic Murphy United Kingdom Dominic Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Dominic Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pierce. The network helps show where David Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Pierce Line = papers co-authored together David Pierce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977146
2 1981138
3 201083
4 198766
5 201564
6 198463
7 200863
8 200843
9 201633
10 201529
11
A controlled trial of internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for panic disorder with face-to-face support from a general practitioner or email support from a psychologist.
200827
12 201226
13 201625
14 200024
15 198423
16 201720
17 201420
18 200918
19 200717
20 202017

About David Pierce

David Pierce is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (9 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (548 citations), Applied Psychology (99 citations), Health (88 citations), Social Psychology (186 citations) and Emergency Medicine (70 citations). David Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Gunn, Dimitrios Pallis, Siaw‐Teng Liaw, Jenny Gibbons, Peter Schattner, Ciaran Pier, Victoria Wade, Britt Klein, David Austin and Randall D. Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Australian Journal of Rural Health, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Rural and Remote Health and BMC Family Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact