Jane Baxter

31 papers receiving 944 citations

Peers

Jane Baxter
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Management Information Systems 652
  • Public Administration 141
  • Accounting 369
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 304
  • Strategy and Management 277
Replace Ed Vosselman with:
Ed Vosselman Netherlands
Jonas Gerdin Sweden
Utz Schäffer Germany
Habib Mahama Australia
Jan Bouwens Netherlands
Kalle Kraus Sweden
Angelo Ditillo Italy
Anne Loft Sweden
Marilyn Neimark United States
Barbara D. Merino United States
Jane Baxter relative to Ed Vosselman Netherlands Ed Vosselman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ed Vosselman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Baxter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Baxter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Baxter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Baxter. The network helps show where Jane Baxter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jane Baxter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Baxter Line = papers co-authored together Jane Baxter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003305
2 2006166
3 200897
4
Doing Field Research: Practice and Meta-Theory in Counterpoint
199885
5 201854
6 200847
7 201044
8 201536
9 200731
10 200329
11 200522
12 199920
13 201916
14 200114
15 200814
16
Management accounting inscriptions and the post-industrial experience of organizational control
20039
17 20199
18 20216
19 20205
20 20094

About Jane Baxter

Jane Baxter is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Public Administration, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (27 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (11 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (10 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (5 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (4 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (652 citations), Public Administration (141 citations), Accounting (369 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (304 citations) and Strategy and Management (277 citations). Jane Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Wai Fong Chua, Paul Andon, Linda English, Kalle Kraus, Martin Carlsson‐Wall, Christina Boedker, Habib Mahama, Graham L. Bradley, David Emsley and Jan Mouritsen. Their work appears in journals such as Management Accounting Research, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Accounting Organizations and Society and Accounting and Finance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact