Jane Barton

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jane Barton
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 680
  • Occupational Therapy 77
  • General Health Professions 431
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 64
  • Social Psychology 229
Replace Willy Eriksen with:
Willy Eriksen Norway
C. Claudia United States
An Mariman Belgium
Natalia Wege Germany
Rosaria Di Lorenzo Italy
Nancy Norvell United States
Frida Eek Sweden
Virginia A. Price United States
Emese Csipke United Kingdom
Victoria Blom Sweden
Jane Barton relative to Willy Eriksen Norway Willy Eriksen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Willy Eriksen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Barton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Barton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Barton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Barton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Barton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Barton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Barton. The network helps show where Jane Barton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jane Barton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Barton Line = papers co-authored together Jane Barton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995257
2 1994118
3 1995110
4 200996
5 199378
6 199968
7 199565
8 200757
9 200756
10 199149
11 199345
12 199544
13 199524
14 199323
15 199323
16 201020
17 199420
18
Measurement properties of the Shiftwork Survey and Standard Shiftwork Index.
200119
19 199517
20 200915

About Jane Barton

Jane Barton is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Rehabilitation and Clinical Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (14 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (12 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (680 citations), Occupational Therapy (77 citations), General Health Professions (431 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (64 citations) and Social Psychology (229 citations). Jane Barton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Simon Folkard, Evelien Spelten, Peter Totterdell, Lawrence Smith, Giovanni Costa, Paul Norman, Paul Norman, Carlla S. Smith, Chet Robie and Ian Macdonald. Their work appears in journals such as Work & Stress, Ergonomics, Journal of Applied Psychology, Rehabilitation Psychology and SLEEP.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact