Rehabilitation Psychology

2.1k papers and 38.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 38.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology usually cover Clinical Psychology (623 papers), Epidemiology (385 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (238 papers) specifically the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury Research (334 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (222 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (155 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rehabilitation Psychology are James S. Krause, Timothy R. Elliott, Dana S. Dunn, Kathleen R. Bogart, Craig K. Enders, Aleksandra Łuszczyńska, Ralf Schwarzer, Sonia Lippke, Maria T. Schultheis and Albert Rizzo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Rehabilitation Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rehabilitation Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rehabilitation Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025