Countries where authors publish in Rehabilitation Psychology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rehabilitation Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rehabilitation Psychology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology.
About Rehabilitation Psychology
The 2.2k papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 46.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Rehabilitation Psychology usually cover Clinical Psychology (381 papers), Rehabilitation (80 papers), Applied Psychology (59 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (199 papers) and Epidemiology (306 papers) specifically the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury Research (277 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (150 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (143 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (79 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (71 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (68 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (65 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rehabilitation Psychology are James S. Krause, Timothy R. Elliott, Dana S. Dunn, Maria T. Schultheis, Kathleen R. Bogart, Albert Rizzo, Emily M. Lund, Aleksandra Łuszczyńska, Ralf Schwarzer and Craig K. Enders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.