Jan Hofer
Impact in
- General Psychology top 0.5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Psychological Testing and Assessment 36
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 24
- Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research 8
- Co-authors
- Holger Busch (45 shared papers)Athanasios Chasiotis (20 shared papers)Domingo Campos (7 shared papers)Joscha Kärtner (5 shared papers)Florian Kießling (8 shared papers)Iva Poláčková Šolcová (10 shared papers)Peter Tavel (8 shared papers)Michael Harris Bond (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Jan Hofer
73 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- General Psychology 235
- Applied Psychology 755
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 141
- Social Psychology 935
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 572
Countries citing papers authored by Jan Hofer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Hofer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Hofer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Hofer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Hofer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Hofer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Hofer. The network helps show where Jan Hofer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Hofer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 153 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 131 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 130 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 125 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 103 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 97 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 77 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 68 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 58 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 54 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 47 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 44 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 42 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 33 |
About Jan Hofer
Jan Hofer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (36 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (24 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (22 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (14 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (13 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (235 citations), Applied Psychology (755 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (141 citations), Social Psychology (935 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (572 citations). Jan Hofer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hong Kong and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Holger Busch, Athanasios Chasiotis, Domingo Campos, Joscha Kärtner, Florian Kießling, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, Peter Tavel, Michael Harris Bond, Ming Li and Alma M. L. Au. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Journal of Personality, Motivation and Emotion, Journal of Happiness Studies and Identity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.