Michael Bender

83 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michael Bender
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • General Psychology 48
  • Applied Psychology 161
  • Social Psychology 461
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 268
  • General Decision Sciences 36
Replace Claire V. McGuire with:
Claire V. McGuire United States
Deborah L. Best United States
Michael A. Zárate United States
Bo Ekehammar Sweden
Tonya Y. Schooler United States
Martin F. Davies United Kingdom
Richard Christie United States
Lauren E. Duncan United States
Karl E. Scheibe United States
Changming Duan United States
Michael Bender relative to Claire V. McGuire United States Claire V. McGuire's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Claire V. McGuire · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bender

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bender more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bender

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bender. The network helps show where Michael Bender may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Bender Line = papers co-authored together Michael Bender links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019104
2 198492
3 200574
4 201869
5 199765
6 201352
7 201451
8 202051
9 201549
10 200246
11 200246
12 201844
13 201340
14 201737
15 201235
16 201734
17 201234
18 201532
19 201332
20 202129

About Michael Bender

Michael Bender is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (31 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (20 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (9 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (9 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (8 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (7 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (6 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (48 citations), Applied Psychology (161 citations), Social Psychology (461 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (268 citations) and General Decision Sciences (36 citations). Michael Bender has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Athanasios Chasiotis, Radosveta Dimitrova, Fons J. R. van de Vijver, Rüdiger Pohl, Fons van de Vijver, Yvette van Osch, Richard Cheston, Willem W. A. Sleegers, Zeynep Cemalcılar and Xiaodong Yue. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie), Social and Personality Psychology Compass and Cross-Cultural Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact