Jack J. Bauer

42 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Jack J. Bauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 231
  • Applied Psychology 389
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 901
  • Social Psychology 972
  • Clinical Psychology 681
Replace Jonathan M. Adler with:
Jonathan M. Adler United States
Jennifer Lodi‐Smith United States
Brent W. Roberts United States
W. Richard Walker United States
Lauren E. Duncan United States
Paul Wink United States
Eva C. Klohnen United States
Marie Hennecke Switzerland
Jeffrey Dean Webster Canada
Jennifer L. Smith United States
Jack J. Bauer relative to Jonathan M. Adler United States Jonathan M. Adler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jonathan M. Adler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack J. Bauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack J. Bauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack J. Bauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack J. Bauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack J. Bauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack J. Bauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack J. Bauer. The network helps show where Jack J. Bauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jack J. Bauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack J. Bauer Line = papers co-authored together Jack J. Bauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006292
2 2006292
3 2005251
4 2004233
5 2003163
6 2010127
7 200197
8 201496
9 200466
10 200859
11 201851
12 201747
13 201446
14 200546
15 201044
16 201842
17 200140
18 200137
19 200135
20 200827

About Jack J. Bauer

Jack J. Bauer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Identity, Memory, and Therapy (24 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (11 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (11 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (10 papers), Ego Development and Educational Practices (6 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (231 citations), Applied Psychology (389 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (901 citations), Social Psychology (972 citations) and Clinical Psychology (681 citations). Jack J. Bauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Dan P. McAdams, Jennifer L. Pals, Heidi A. Wayment, George A. Bonanno, Sun W. Park, Nana Akua Anyidoho, Kateryna M. Sylaska, Barton J. Hirsch, Holly Hart and Michael F. Steger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Happiness Studies, Journal of Personality, Journal of Research in Personality, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact