Holger Busch

1.8k citations
57 papers · 959 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Holger Busch

54 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers

Holger Busch
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 110
  • General Psychology 93
  • Applied Psychology 331
  • Social Psychology 424
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 258
Replace Abigail J. Stewart with:
Abigail J. Stewart United States
Barbara A. Woike United States
Klaus F. Riegel United States
Barbara S. Held United States
Walter Dill Scott United States
Jana Nikitin Switzerland
Joseph M. Fitzgerald United States
Wolfgang Friedlmeier United States
Stefan E. Hormuth Germany
C. Douglas McCann Canada
Holger Busch relative to Abigail J. Stewart United States Abigail J. Stewart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Abigail J. Stewart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Holger Busch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Busch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Busch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Busch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Holger Busch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Busch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Busch. The network helps show where Holger Busch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Holger Busch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Holger Busch Line = papers co-authored together Holger Busch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007112
2 201171
3 201065
4 201454
5 201046
6 201145
7 200634
8 201032
9 200530
10 201129
11 200728
12 201228
13 201027
14 201627
15 200826
16 201825
17 201023
18 201523
19 201819
20 197918

About Holger Busch

Holger Busch is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (21 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (17 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (15 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (10 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (8 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (7 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (6 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (110 citations), General Psychology (93 citations), Applied Psychology (331 citations), Social Psychology (424 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (258 citations). Holger Busch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hong Kong and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Jan Hofer, Joscha Kärtner, Athanasios Chasiotis, Domingo Campos, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, Peter Tavel, Florian Kießling, Michael Harris Bond, Alma Au and Ming Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality, Identity, Motivation and Emotion, Journal of Happiness Studies and Pharmacopsychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact