Holger Busch
Impact in
- General Psychology top 1%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Psychological Testing and Assessment 24
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 17
- Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research 7
- Co-authors
- Jan Hofer (48 shared papers)Athanasios Chasiotis (6 shared papers)Joscha Kärtner (4 shared papers)Domingo Campos (4 shared papers)Florian Kießling (5 shared papers)Peter Tavel (8 shared papers)Iva Poláčková Šolcová (9 shared papers)Michael Harris Bond (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Holger Busch
70 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- General Psychology 134
- Applied Psychology 455
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 133
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 343
- Social Psychology 505
Countries citing papers authored by Holger Busch
This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Busch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Busch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Busch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Holger Busch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Busch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Busch. The network helps show where Holger Busch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Holger Busch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 134 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 49 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 26 |
About Holger Busch
Holger Busch is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (24 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (20 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (17 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (12 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (10 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (8 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (7 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (134 citations), Applied Psychology (455 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (133 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (343 citations) and Social Psychology (505 citations). Holger Busch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hong Kong and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Jan Hofer, Athanasios Chasiotis, Joscha Kärtner, Domingo Campos, Florian Kießling, Peter Tavel, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, Michael Harris Bond, Ming Li and Alma Au. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality, Identity, Journal of Happiness Studies, Motivation and Emotion and Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.