James C. Walker

1.5k citations
59 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

    • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 17
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 5
    • Religious Education and Schools 4

James C. Walker

55 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

James C. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Sensory Systems 458
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 176
  • Biomedical Engineering 398
  • Chemical Health and Safety 6
  • Gender Studies 78
Replace Anna Oleszkiewicz with:
Anna Oleszkiewicz Poland
Gary Beauchamp United Kingdom
Elisabeth Oberzaucher Austria
Gill Francis Australia
Bruce M. Ross United States
Leonard Weller Israel
Gregg E. A. Solomon United States
Jaroslava Varella Valentová Brazil
Erik E. Filsinger United States
Michael Lavin United Kingdom
James C. Walker relative to Anna Oleszkiewicz Poland Anna Oleszkiewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anna Oleszkiewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Walker. The network helps show where James C. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Walker Line = papers co-authored together James C. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004160
2 2005147
3 1989119
4 196479
5 198560
6 200356
7 198640
8 200139
9 197938
10 199132
11 198527
12 198227
13 198224
14 200123
15 199723
16 198622
17 199222
18 199021
19 198320
20 200118

About James C. Walker

James C. Walker is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Education, Biomedical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (17 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (16 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (6 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (6 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (5 papers), Religious Education and Schools (4 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (4 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (458 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (176 citations), Biomedical Engineering (398 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (6 citations) and Gender Studies (78 citations). James C. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Hall, Colin W. Evers, Dennis H. Passe, Peter J. Cavnar, James L. Jacobson, D. Thane R. Cody, Reginald G. Bickford, Roger A. Jennings, Don M. Tucker and James C. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Philosophy and Theory, Chemical Senses, Curriculum Inquiry, Educational Theory and Indoor Air.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact