Jack Hobbs

18 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

Jack Hobbs
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 59
  • Music 16
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 54
  • Philosophy 32
Replace Rob Pope with:
Rob Pope United Kingdom
Anton Ehrenzweig United States
Cyril Barrett United Kingdom
Peter Abbs United Kingdom
Dorothy Heathcote Ireland
Deanne Bogdan Canada
Gavin Bolton United States
Julia Margaret Cameron United Kingdom
Éva Vass Australia
Timothy Mooney Ireland
Jack Hobbs relative to Rob Pope United Kingdom Rob Pope's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Rob Pope · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Hobbs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Hobbs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Hobbs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Hobbs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Hobbs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Hobbs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Hobbs. The network helps show where Jack Hobbs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jack Hobbs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Hobbs Line = papers co-authored together Jack Hobbs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Visual Experience
199080
2 200245
3 198443
4
Climate Variability and the Dengue Outbreak in Townsville, Queensland, 1992-93
200118
5 200215
6
Art in context
197511
7 19777
8 20026
9 20005
10 19835
11 19853
12
Ferns for New Zealand gardens
19983
13 19843
14 19933
15 19882
16 19732
17
Arts, ideas, and civilization
19892
18 19772
19 19901
20 19801

About Jack Hobbs

Jack Hobbs is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Education, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science and Plant Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Education and Development (8 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (2 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (2 papers), Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper) and Zoonotic diseases and public health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (59 citations), Music (16 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (54 citations) and Philosophy (32 citations). Jack Hobbs has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Kupfer, Lesley A. Rex, Peng Bi, Kevin A. Parton, Shilu Tong and David E. Shi. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Art Education, Art Education, Environmental Health, American Educational Research Journal and Leonardo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact