Jacek Gralewski

1.6k citations
23 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jacek Gralewski

23 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jacek Gralewski
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 831
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 240
  • Social Psychology 236
  • Music 36
Replace Aleksandra Gajda with:
Aleksandra Gajda Poland
Elisabeth Rudowicz Hong Kong
Anna N. N. Hui Hong Kong
Weiguo Pang China
Dorota M. Jankowska Poland
Lisa DaVia Rubenstein United States
Nils Myszkowski United States
Joseph Kasof United States
Edwin C. Selby United States
Dan Davies United Kingdom
Jacek Gralewski relative to Aleksandra Gajda Poland Aleksandra Gajda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Aleksandra Gajda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacek Gralewski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacek Gralewski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacek Gralewski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacek Gralewski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacek Gralewski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacek Gralewski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacek Gralewski. The network helps show where Jacek Gralewski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jacek Gralewski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jacek Gralewski Line = papers co-authored together Jacek Gralewski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013182
2 2016173
3 201580
4 201377
5 201671
6 201269
7 201261
8 202050
9 201844
10 201942
11 201739
12 201635
13 201634
14 202034
15 201630
16 200626
17 202212
18 20249
19 20244
20 20214

About Jacek Gralewski

Jacek Gralewski is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Social Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (23 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (15 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (6 papers), Art Education and Development (5 papers), Educational Methods and Teacher Development (4 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers) and Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (831 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (105 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (240 citations), Social Psychology (236 citations) and Music (36 citations). Jacek Gralewski has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Austria and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Maciej Karwowski, Izabela Lebuda, Dorota M. Jankowska, Ewa Wiśniewska, Aleksandra Gajda, Grzegorz Szumski, Mathias Benedek, Emanuel Jauk, Jan Dul and Ewa Wiśniewska. Their work appears in journals such as Thinking Skills and Creativity, The Journal of Creative Behavior, Learning and Individual Differences, Intelligence and Creativity Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact