Creativity Studies

311 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 311 papers published in Creativity Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Creativity Studies usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 papers), Sociology and Political Science (76 papers) and Urban Studies (50 papers) specifically the topics of Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (88 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (41 papers) and Educational Methods and Teacher Development (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Creativity Studies are Musarat Yasmin, Łukasz Sułkowski, Ricardo-Adán Salas-Rueda, John Rafafy Batlolona, Marleny Leasa, Myroslav Kryshtanovych, Seungbae Park, Yuriy Bilan, Tetyana Vasilyeva and Borisas Melnikas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Creativity Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Creativity Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Creativity Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Creativity Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Creativity Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Creativity Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Creativity Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025