I.W. Griffiths

1.6k citations
47 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

I.W. Griffiths

43 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

I.W. Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Spectroscopy 402
  • Developmental Biology 35
  • Ecology 301
  • Analytical Chemistry 114
  • Small Animals 64
Replace David Armitage with:
David Armitage United States
Joakim Bood Sweden
Liang Mei China
Hagit Hel‐Or Israel
Stephen A. Jones United Kingdom
J. E. Piercy Canada
V. Sarafis Australia
Michael J. Schmidt United States
Kevin S. Repasky United States
Max Deffenbaugh United States
I.W. Griffiths relative to David Armitage United States David Armitage's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.3×
David Armitage · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I.W. Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.W. Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.W. Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.W. Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.W. Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.W. Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.W. Griffiths. The network helps show where I.W. Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I.W. Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I.W. Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together I.W. Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012285
2 2013118
3 198174
4 201273
5 198167
6 198063
7 201558
8 198133
9 201132
10 198131
11 201326
12 198125
13 198125
14 198225
15 201725
16 199724
17 198123
18
Principles of Biomechanics & Motion Analysis
200523
19 200520
20 201017

About I.W. Griffiths

I.W. Griffiths is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Economics and Econometrics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (7 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (7 papers), Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics (6 papers), Sports Performance and Training (6 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (402 citations), Developmental Biology (35 citations), Ecology (301 citations), Analytical Chemistry (114 citations) and Small Animals (64 citations). I.W. Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include F.M. Harris, Emad Mukhtar, J. H. Beynon, Rory P. Wilson, Emily L. C. Shepard, Lewis G. Halsey, Phil Legg, Lama Qasem, Adrian C. Gleiss and David Chung. Their work appears in journals such as Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, PLoS ONE, Chemical Physics Letters and IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact