IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

239.2k citations
6.4k papers · · active since 1995

Impact in

Papers in

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

6k papers receiving 230.6k citations

Peers

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 43.3k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 123.4k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 26.7k
  • Computational Mechanics 21.5k
  • Signal Processing 3.9k
Replace Computer Graphics Forum with:
Computer Graphics Forum United States
ACM Transactions on Graphics United States
International Journal of Computer Vision United States
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications United States
Communications of the ACM United States
Computer Vision and Image Understanding United States
ACM Computing Surveys United States
Computers & Graphics China
The Visual Computer China
Image and Vision Computing China
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics relative to Computer Graphics Forum United States Computer Graphics Forum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5.0×
Computer Graphics Forum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

About IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

The 6.4k papers published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics in the last decades have received a total of 239.2k indexed citations . Papers published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics usually cover Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (2k papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (3.5k papers), Human-Computer Interaction (890 papers), Computational Mechanics (780 papers) and Media Technology (132 papers) specifically the topics of Data Visualization and Analytics (2.8k papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (2k papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (717 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (576 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (378 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (222 papers), Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (149 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics are Jeffrey Heer, Daniel A. Keim, Tamara Munzner, Kwan‐Liu Ma, Hanspeter Pfister, John Stasko, Jean‐Daniel Fekete, Peter Lindström, Huamin Qu and Nelson Max.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact