Phil Legg

54 papers receiving 995 citations

Peers

Phil Legg
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Signal Processing 275
  • Computer Networks and Communications 390
  • Information Systems 361
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 281
  • Artificial Intelligence 264
Replace Julio Hernández-Castro with:
Julio Hernández-Castro United Kingdom
Luis Hernández Encinas Spain
Giorgos Stamou Greece
Ankita Jain India
Abhinav Kumar India
Lihua Yue China
Josep Lluís Arcos Spain
Chao Yang China
Dong Hyun Jeong United States
Mingyu Chen China
Phil Legg relative to Julio Hernández-Castro United Kingdom Julio Hernández-Castro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Julio Hernández-Castro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Legg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Legg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Legg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Legg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Legg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Legg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Legg. The network helps show where Phil Legg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Legg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Legg Line = papers co-authored together Phil Legg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014118
2 2013117
3 201593
4 201269
5 201354
6 202249
7 201347
8 201536
9 201535
10 202134
11 201431
12 201130
13 201530
14 201324
15 202021
16 201919
17 201517
18 201916
19 201515
20 202215

About Phil Legg

Phil Legg is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Signal Processing, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Network Security and Intrusion Detection (16 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (14 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (12 papers), Information and Cyber Security (9 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (275 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (390 citations), Information Systems (361 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (281 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (264 citations). Phil Legg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Sadie Creese, Michael Goldsmith, Oliver Buckley, I.W. Griffiths, Jason R. C. Nurse, Paul L. Rosin, David Chung, James P. Morgan, Andrew McCarthy and Panagiotis Andriotis. Their work appears in journals such as Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, Computers & Security, IEEE Systems Journal, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact