Mark W. Jones

107 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Mark W. Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 451
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 784
  • Signal Processing 233
  • Computational Mechanics 374
  • Ecological Modeling 43
Replace Maureen Stone with:
Maureen Stone United States
Andrew Johnson United States
Volker Blanz Germany
Benjamin Watson United States
Robert V. Kenyon United States
Graham W. Taylor Canada
James H. Elder Canada
David W. Jacobs United States
Manish Singh United States
Kobus Barnard United States
Mark W. Jones relative to Maureen Stone United States Maureen Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Maureen Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark W. Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark W. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark W. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark W. Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark W. Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark W. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark W. Jones. The network helps show where Mark W. Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark W. Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark W. Jones Line = papers co-authored together Mark W. Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006284
2 199581
3 201581
4 202171
5 201269
6 199769
7 201969
8 199464
9 199663
10 198757
11 201956
12 201552
13 201250
14 200146
15 201545
16
Facial Reconstruction Using Volumetric Data
200134
17 200934
18 198533
19 200929
20 200928

About Mark W. Jones

Mark W. Jones is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Sociology and Political Science, Computational Mechanics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (25 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (18 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (18 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (12 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (9 papers), Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (8 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (451 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (784 citations), Signal Processing (233 citations), Computational Mechanics (374 citations) and Ecological Modeling (43 citations). Mark W. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Jakob Andreas Bærentzen, Miloš Šrámek, Xianghua Xie, Mohammed Ali, Ali Alqahtani, Barbara Sims, Ben F. Spencer, James S. Walker, Chen Min and Robert S. Laramee. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Graphics Forum, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, The Visual Computer, Journal of Crime and Justice and Computer Vision and Image Understanding.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact