Irving Crespi

734 citations
31 papers · 488 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Irving Crespi

22 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Irving Crespi
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Communication 125
  • Political Science and International Relations 229
  • General Decision Sciences 13
  • Marketing 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 191
Replace Stanley Kelley with:
Stanley Kelley United States
Robert H. Ferrell United States
Lisa Hill Australia
Amy Gangl United States
Susumu Shikano Germany
Amy Fried United States
Leon H. Mayhew United States
Damon M. Cann United States
Frank Winston Wylie United States
Robert G. Cushing Australia
Irving Crespi relative to Stanley Kelley United States Stanley Kelley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Stanley Kelley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Irving Crespi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Irving Crespi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irving Crespi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irving Crespi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Irving Crespi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irving Crespi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irving Crespi. The network helps show where Irving Crespi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Irving Crespi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Irving Crespi Line = papers co-authored together Irving Crespi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199078
2 197669
3
Polls, television, and the new politics
197055
4 199142
5 197136
6 199135
7 199133
8
Attitude research on the rocks
196826
9 196119
10 197715
11 198013
12 198412
13 19689
14
Pre-election polling
19889
15 19568
16 19878
17 19616
18 19775
19 19642
20 20132

About Irving Crespi

Irving Crespi is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Clinical Psychology, Marketing and Linguistics and Language, having authored 31 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Housing Market and Economics (1 paper), Public Policy and Governance (1 paper), Census and Population Estimation (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), School Choice and Performance (1 paper), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper) and Academic Freedom and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (125 citations), Political Science and International Relations (229 citations), General Decision Sciences (13 citations), Marketing (42 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (191 citations). Irving Crespi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and China. Frequent co-authors include Seymour Sudman, Harold Mendelsohn, Iain McLean, Kurt Lang, Lee P. Adler, Benjamin Ginsberg, Martin Shefter, James W. Dearing, Ernest Dichter and Richard A. Brody. Their work appears in journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact