Ian Stuart

1.4k citations
7 papers · 1.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ian Stuart

6 papers receiving 961 citations

Ian Stuart's Hit Papers

Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective 2002 · 775 citations
7750+8+16Years since publication250500750

Peers

Ian Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Management Information Systems 576
  • Strategy and Management 594
  • Marketing 249
  • Business and International Management 50
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 130
Replace Ron McLachlin with:
Ron McLachlin Canada
Britta Gammelgaard Denmark
Daniel Samson Australia
Michiel R. Leenders Canada
John C. Goodale United States
Maike Scherrer Switzerland
Stefano Biazzo Italy
Hojung Shin South Korea
Roberto Panizzolo Italy
Trevor Cadden United Kingdom
Ian Stuart relative to Ron McLachlin Canada Ron McLachlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ron McLachlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Stuart. The network helps show where Ian Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Ian Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Stuart Line = papers co-authored together Ian Stuart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective
Hit paper breakdown →
2002775
2 1997143
3 201194
4
A Leveraged Learning Network
199856
5 19959
6
A Web-Based Genealogy System
20032
7 20010

About Ian Stuart

Ian Stuart is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Automotive Engineering, Strategy and Management, Information Systems and Marketing, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Quality and Management Systems (1 paper), Library Science and Information Systems (1 paper), Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper), Operations Management Techniques (1 paper), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (1 paper) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (576 citations), Strategy and Management (594 citations), Marketing (249 citations), Business and International Management (50 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (130 citations). Ian Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David McCutcheon, Daniel Samson, Robert Handfield, Ron McLachlin, Stephen S. Tax, Maike Scherrer, Todd A. Boyle and Paul T. Decker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Retailing, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Journal of Operations Management, Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness and VINE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact