Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

34.1k citations
3.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

2.5k papers receiving 25.5k citations

Peers

Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 2.8k
  • Occupational Therapy 3.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 11.1k
  • Safety Research 4.4k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 5.9k
Replace International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction with:
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction United States
Disability and Rehabilitation United States
Journal of Organizational Behavior United States
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies United States
Disability & Society United Kingdom
Behaviour and Information Technology United States
American Journal of Occupational Therapy United States
Personnel Psychology United States
Research in Developmental Disabilities United States
British Journal of Educational Psychology United Kingdom
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness relative to International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction United States International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness.

About Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

The 3.6k papers published in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness in the last decades have received a total of 34.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness usually cover Human Factors and Ergonomics (358 papers), Occupational Therapy (204 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (912 papers), Safety Research (354 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (473 papers) specifically the topics of Tactile and Sensory Interactions (771 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (363 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (357 papers), Disability Education and Employment (294 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (280 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (204 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (201 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness are Robert Wall Emerson, Michele C. McDonnall, Lauren J. Lieberman, Corinne Kirchner, L. Penny Rosenblum, Anne L. Corn, Karen E. Wolffe, Stacy M. Kelly, Adele Crudden and Michael Brambring.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact