Hanne Andersen

1.6k citations
60 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Hanne Andersen

55 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers

Hanne Andersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • History and Philosophy of Science 373
  • Information Systems and Management 145
  • General Psychology 23
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 179
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 115
Replace Robert Nola with:
Robert Nola New Zealand
Gürol Irzık Türkiye
Eric Livingston Australia
Catherine Z. Elgin United States
Douglas Allchin United States
Paul T. Durbin United States
John L. Rudolph United States
David Topper Canada
Ron Good United States
Peter Caws United States
Hanne Andersen relative to Robert Nola New Zealand Robert Nola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Robert Nola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hanne Andersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hanne Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hanne Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hanne Andersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hanne Andersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hanne Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hanne Andersen. The network helps show where Hanne Andersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hanne Andersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hanne Andersen Line = papers co-authored together Hanne Andersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014165
2 2006107
3 2015103
4 201285
5 199644
6 199839
7 201636
8 201234
9 199631
10 200130
11 200628
12 200027
13 201326
14 200025
15 199623
16 201522
17 200220
18 200119
19 201518
20 200016

About Hanne Andersen

Hanne Andersen is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (24 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (7 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (6 papers), Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Social and Educational Sciences (4 papers), Science and Climate Studies (3 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (373 citations), Information Systems and Management (145 citations), General Psychology (23 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (179 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations). Hanne Andersen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Barker, Susann Wagenknecht, Douglas Allchin, Xiang Chen, Nancy J. Nersessian, Heather King, Paul Hoyningen‐Huene, Stig Brorson, Xiang Chen and Xiang Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Centaurus, Synthese, Philosophical Psychology and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact