David Topper

2.0k citations
74 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Topper

56 papers receiving 767 citations

Peers

David Topper
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 74
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 150
  • History and Philosophy of Science 126
  • Theoretical Computer Science 24
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
Replace Elizabeth de Freitas with:
Elizabeth de Freitas United Kingdom
Nathan Houser United States
Christian J. W. Kloesel United States
Eric Livingston Australia
Marx W. Wartofsky United States
Gastón Bachelard United States
Gilbert Simondon Spain
Michael Fried Israel
Justus Buchler Germany
Henri Bergson Canada
David Topper relative to Elizabeth de Freitas United Kingdom Elizabeth de Freitas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Elizabeth de Freitas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Topper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Topper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Topper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Topper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Topper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Topper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Topper. The network helps show where David Topper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside David Topper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Topper Line = papers co-authored together David Topper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981351
2 1991224
3 198071
4 197969
5 198957
6 199241
7 197924
8 197422
9 199622
10 200020
11
RTcmix - Using CMIX in Real Time.
199717
12 197813
13 199813
14 201210
15 199010
16 198010
17 19809
18 19899
19 20058
20 19798

About David Topper

David Topper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (11 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (8 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (7 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (6 papers), Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (5 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (4 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (74 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (150 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (126 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (24 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations). David Topper has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marx W. Wartofsky, Brian Wallis, Gerald Holton, Sandra Harding, John H. Holloway, E. H. Gombrich, Thomas Kühn, William A. Simpson, Pierre Auger and Rochelle S. Newman. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, Technology and Culture, Perception, The British Journal of Aesthetics and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact