Peter Caws

37 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers

Peter Caws
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • History and Philosophy of Science 72
  • General Psychology 8
  • Philosophy 69
  • Computer Science Applications 33
  • Information Systems and Management 41
Replace Paul T. Durbin with:
Paul T. Durbin United States
Eric Livingston Australia
Virgil Hinshaw United States
Gary A. Cziko United States
Larry A. Hickman United States
Michael H. G. Hoffmann United States
Esa Saarinen Finland
Allan Janik Austria
Robert M. Pirsig
Robert E. Haskell United States
Peter Caws relative to Paul T. Durbin United States Paul T. Durbin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Paul T. Durbin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Caws

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Caws's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Caws with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Caws more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Caws

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Caws. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Caws. The network helps show where Peter Caws may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Peter Caws, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Caws Line = papers co-authored together Peter Caws links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995401
2 197640
3
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
199131
4 197430
5 196926
6
Structuralism: A Philosophy for the Human Sciences
199721
7 199119
8 201516
9 196614
10 195912
11 20038
12 19897
13
Two centuries of philosophy in America
19806
14 19985
15 19635
16 19575
17 19785
18 19995
19 19934
20
Science and the theory of value
19674

About Peter Caws

Peter Caws is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper) and Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (72 citations), General Psychology (8 citations), Philosophy (69 citations), Computer Science Applications (33 citations) and Information Systems and Management (41 citations). Peter Caws has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carl Mitcham, Joseph Agassi, R. J. Connelly, Sara T. Fry, Thomas J. Bole, Joseph Boyle, Alisa L. Carse, John Coverdale, John D. Arras and Todd May. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophy of Science, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, American Anthropologist and The Hastings Center Report.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact