Thomas Uebel

2.8k citations
87 papers · 888 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Uebel

73 papers receiving 702 citations

Peers

Thomas Uebel
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • History and Philosophy of Science 683
  • General Psychology 68
  • Theoretical Computer Science 45
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 188
  • Philosophy 105
Replace George A. Reisch with:
George A. Reisch United States
Otto Neurath
Maurice A. Finocchiaro United States
Edward Grant United States
David J. Stump United States
Peter Dear United States
Robert Nola New Zealand
Murray G. Murphey United States
William Warren Bartley United States
G. P. Henderson United Kingdom
Thomas Uebel relative to George A. Reisch United States George A. Reisch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
George A. Reisch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Uebel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Uebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Uebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Uebel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Uebel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Uebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Uebel. The network helps show where Thomas Uebel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Uebel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Uebel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Uebel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199692
2 199690
3 200049
4
Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circle's Protocol-Sentence Debate
200743
5 199242
6 200535
7
Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate
199230
8 201429
9 199625
10 199725
11 201323
12 200423
13 200523
14 200022
15 200819
16 200817
17 201317
18 199115
19 199313
20 200413

About Thomas Uebel

Thomas Uebel is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Psychology, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 87 papers that have together received 888 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (67 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (59 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (25 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (17 papers), German Social Sciences and History (7 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (5 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (683 citations), General Psychology (68 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (45 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (188 citations) and Philosophy (105 citations). Thomas Uebel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Lola Fleck, Jordi Cat, Nancy Cartwright, John O’Neill, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. González, Steven Beller, Marcel Weber, María Carla Galavotti and Hanne Andersen. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Metascience, The Philosophical Review, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and Perspectives on Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact