Dag Prawitz
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 0.2%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
- Artificial Intelligence top 0.5%
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Logic, programming, and type systems
Papers in
-
- History and Theory of Mathematics 15
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 36
- Logic, programming, and type systems 23
- Co-authors
- Dag Westerståhl (3 shared papers)Brian Skyrms (1 shared paper)Florian Steinberger (1 shared paper)Hannes Leitgeb (1 shared paper)Massimiliano Carrara (1 shared paper)Jack Woods (1 shared paper)Graham Priest (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Dag Prawitz
67 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Theoretical Computer Science 310
- Artificial Intelligence 2k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 794
- Philosophy 428
- History and Philosophy of Science 252
Countries citing papers authored by Dag Prawitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Dag Prawitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dag Prawitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dag Prawitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dag Prawitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dag Prawitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dag Prawitz. The network helps show where Dag Prawitz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Dag Prawitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study | 1965 | 762 |
| 2 | 1971 | 427 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 169 | |
| 4 | 1960 | 137 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 118 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 98 | |
| 7 | 1973 | 82 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 76 | |
| 9 | 1968 | 63 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 58 | |
| 11 | 1968 | 51 | |
| 12 | 1960 | 42 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 42 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 17 | 1970 | 28 | |
| 18 | 1967 | 23 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 21 |
About Dag Prawitz
Dag Prawitz is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (36 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (23 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (15 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (13 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (6 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (310 citations), Artificial Intelligence (2k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (794 citations), Philosophy (428 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (252 citations). Dag Prawitz has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Dag Westerståhl, Brian Skyrms, Florian Steinberger, Hannes Leitgeb, Massimiliano Carrara, Jack Woods and Graham Priest. Their work appears in journals such as Theoria, Synthese, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Topoi and Lecture notes in mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.