Australasian Journal of Philosophy

2.3k papers and 23.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 23.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy usually cover Philosophy (914 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (693 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (422 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (656 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (537 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (337 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australasian Journal of Philosophy are David Lewis, David Lewis, David Lewis, Richard Holton, Jonathan Schaffer, Karen Neander, Fred Dretske, Peter Forrest, Brian O'Shaughnessy and Theodore Sider.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Australasian Journal of Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australasian Journal of Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025