Graeme Archer

15 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

Graeme Archer
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 153
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Small Animals 36
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 16
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Jacob Peedicayil with:
Jacob Peedicayil India
Susan E. Nicol United States
Chris D. Schubart Netherlands
Ivo Caers Belgium
Doron Mazeh Israel
Silvia González‐Parra Spain
Alexandra Neyazi Germany
Martha L. Elks United States
Michael J. Taylor United States
Kunj Gohil
Graeme Archer relative to Jacob Peedicayil India Jacob Peedicayil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Jacob Peedicayil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Archer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Archer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Archer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Archer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Archer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Archer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Archer. The network helps show where Graeme Archer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graeme Archer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graeme Archer Line = papers co-authored together Graeme Archer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2006232
2 201355
3 201154
4 201337
5 199635
6 199925
7 201119
8 200015
9 199710
10 20215
11 19963
12 19982
13 19971
14 20161
15
On Some BayesianRegularization Methods for Image Restoration
19951

About Graeme Archer

Graeme Archer is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology, Small Animals, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (3 papers), Diverse Scientific and Engineering Research (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (2 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (153 citations), Biological Psychiatry (19 citations), Small Animals (36 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (16 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Graeme Archer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Christy Chuang‐Stein, Donald Archibald, Craig Mallinckrodt, Andrew C. Leon, Emiliangelo Ratti, Stefano Zamuner, David G. Trist, Robert Alexander, P. Bettica and Lisa Squassante. Their work appears in journals such as Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, Environmental and Ecological Statistics and Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact