Roberto Goméni

4.2k citations
180 papers · 3.3k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Roberto Goméni

175 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Roberto Goméni
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 228
  • Pharmacology 639
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 493
  • Statistics and Probability 248
  • Pharmacology 244
Replace Wayne A. Colburn with:
Wayne A. Colburn United States
Davide Verotta United States
D J Greenblatt United States
Janice B. Schwartz United States
Rik C. Schoemaker Netherlands
Tatsuji Iga Japan
Bob Wilffert Netherlands
Suneel Gupta United States
Jasper Dingemanse Switzerland
Johan Gabrielsson Sweden
Roberto Goméni relative to Wayne A. Colburn United States Wayne A. Colburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Wayne A. Colburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Goméni

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Goméni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Goméni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Goméni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Goméni

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Goméni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Goméni. The network helps show where Roberto Goméni may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Goméni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Goméni Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Goméni links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 180 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984130
2 1976113
3 1978102
4 197980
5 198577
6 199568
7 197864
8 199457
9 201355
10 199955
11 200553
12 201153
13 200652
14 197852
15 197751
16 197948
17 198048
18 201346
19 200846
20 199645

About Roberto Goméni

Roberto Goméni is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 180 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (40 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (22 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (18 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (16 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (14 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (13 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (12 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (228 citations), Pharmacology (639 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (493 citations), Statistics and Probability (248 citations) and Pharmacology (244 citations). Roberto Goméni has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include C. Gomeni, Françoise Bressolle, Emilio Merlo‐Pich, Icilio Cavero, France Mentré, G. Bianchetti, Azmi Nasser, Maurizio Fava, F Lefèvre-Borg and Alan G. Roach. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact