Lydia Sequeira

24 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Lydia Sequeira
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Health Informatics 44
  • Health Information Management 111
  • Applied Psychology 83
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • General Health Professions 96
Replace Nelson Shen with:
Nelson Shen Canada
Jessica Howe United States
Anupama Gunshekar Cemballi United States
Manal Kleib Canada
Hannah G. Mitchell United States
Megan Bamford Canada
Jenni Konttila Finland
Baria Hafeez United States
Jean‐Christophe Bélisle‐Pipon Canada
Nicole Exe United States
Lydia Sequeira relative to Nelson Shen Canada Nelson Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Nelson Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lydia Sequeira

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lydia Sequeira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lydia Sequeira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lydia Sequeira more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lydia Sequeira

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lydia Sequeira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lydia Sequeira. The network helps show where Lydia Sequeira may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lydia Sequeira, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lydia Sequeira Line = papers co-authored together Lydia Sequeira links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020143
2 2019113
3 201970
4 202167
5 201940
6 201937
7 201933
8 202119
9 201915
10 202210
11 20239
12 20198
13 20228
14 20228
15 20225
16 20225
17 20234
18 20223
19 20222
20
Application of the i-PARIHS framework in the implementation of speech recognition technology as a way of addressing documentation burden within a mental health context.
20212

About Lydia Sequeira

Lydia Sequeira is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (8 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (44 citations), Health Information Management (111 citations), Applied Psychology (83 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations) and General Health Professions (96 citations). Lydia Sequeira has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Gillian Strudwick, David Wiljer, John S. Strauss, Nelson Shen, Damian Jankowicz, Tania Tajirian, Michelle Pannor Silver, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Marcos Sanches and T. Bernier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, BMJ Open, JMIR Mental Health and Palliative Care and Social Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact