Feng Deng

97 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Feng Deng
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Orthodontics 266
  • Oral Surgery 274
  • Biomaterials 523
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 332
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.1k
Replace Elliot P. Douglas with:
Elliot P. Douglas United States
Christina Doyle United Kingdom
Richard M. Day United Kingdom
Thomas A. Schildhauer Germany
Thomas J. Webster United States
Kim Cheng Tan Singapore
Yanhua Hou China
Miguel Alaminos Spain
Chang H. Lee United States
Kay C Dee United States
Feng Deng relative to Elliot P. Douglas United States Elliot P. Douglas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Elliot P. Douglas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Deng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Deng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Deng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Deng. The network helps show where Feng Deng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Deng Line = papers co-authored together Feng Deng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014264
2 2011201
3 2016149
4 2015141
5 2012131
6 2015125
7 2014100
8
Understanding New Media Literacy: An Explorative Theoretical Framework
201398
9 201482
10 201478
11
The Relationships among Chinese Practicing Teachers' Epistemic Beliefs, Pedagogical Beliefs and Their Beliefs about the Use of ICT.
201476
12 202074
13 201270
14 202070
15 201767
16 201663
17 201653
18 201450
19 201249
20 201246

About Feng Deng

Feng Deng is a scholar working on Education, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Biomaterials, having authored 101 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (15 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (10 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (9 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (8 papers), Collagen: Extraction and Characterization (7 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (7 papers), Dental materials and restorations (6 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (266 citations), Oral Surgery (274 citations), Biomaterials (523 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (332 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (1.1k citations). Feng Deng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Ching Sing Chai, Chin‐Chung Tsai, Yi Deng, Shicheng Wei, Jinlin Song, Der-Thanq Chen, Anxiu Xu, Lixin Wang, Joyce Hwee Ling Koh and Xiang Gao. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, International Journal of Nanomedicine, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Carbohydrate Polymers and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact