Felix Singleton Thorn

8 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers

Felix Singleton Thorn
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 71
  • General Decision Sciences 7
  • Information Systems and Management 22
  • History and Philosophy of Science 8
  • Applied Psychology 8
Replace Julia G. Bottesini with:
Julia G. Bottesini United States
JP Prims United States
Theiss Bendixen Denmark
Janet von Randow New Zealand
Ivan Flis Netherlands
Stefan Schubert United States
Marı́a Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza Spain
Judith Swan New Zealand
Gianni Ribeiro Australia
Helen C. Lodge United States
Felix Singleton Thorn relative to Julia G. Bottesini United States Julia G. Bottesini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Julia G. Bottesini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felix Singleton Thorn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Singleton Thorn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Singleton Thorn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Singleton Thorn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Singleton Thorn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Singleton Thorn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Singleton Thorn. The network helps show where Felix Singleton Thorn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Felix Singleton Thorn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felix Singleton Thorn Line = papers co-authored together Felix Singleton Thorn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2021119
2 201820
3 20219
4 20198
5 20217
6 20234
7 20172
8 20191

About Felix Singleton Thorn

Felix Singleton Thorn is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper), Military and Defense Studies (1 paper) and International Law and Aviation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (71 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations), Information Systems and Management (22 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations) and Applied Psychology (8 citations). Felix Singleton Thorn has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Timothy M. Errington, Kevin Esterling, Courtney K. Soderberg, Brian A. Nosek, Simine Vazire, Sarah R. Schiavone, Julia G. Bottesini, Fiona Fidler, Ashley Barnett and Hannah Fraser. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Royal Society Open Science, Nature Human Behaviour, Frontiers in Psychology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact