Aidan Lyon

23 papers receiving 485 citations

Aidan Lyon's Hit Papers

Why are Normal Distributions Normal? 2013 · 161 citations
1610+4+8Years since publication50100150

Peers

Aidan Lyon
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • History and Philosophy of Science 179
  • Theoretical Computer Science 15
  • General Decision Sciences 21
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
  • Philosophy 60
Replace Robert K. Meyer with:
Robert K. Meyer Germany
Dana Mackenzie Brazil
Fernando Soler Toscano Spain
Julio Michael Stern Brazil
Chetan Prakash United States
Leonhard Euler Germany
Dale Johnson United States
Ajit Narayanan New Zealand
Simon Fitzpatrick United States
Euclid
Aidan Lyon relative to Robert K. Meyer Germany Robert K. Meyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Robert K. Meyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aidan Lyon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aidan Lyon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aidan Lyon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aidan Lyon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aidan Lyon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aidan Lyon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aidan Lyon. The network helps show where Aidan Lyon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Aidan Lyon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aidan Lyon Line = papers co-authored together Aidan Lyon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Why are Normal Distributions Normal?
Hit paper breakdown →
2013161
2 2007102
3 201170
4 201157
5 201027
6 202122
7 201517
8 201317
9 201314
10 20129
11 20138
12 20236
13 20156
14 20175
15 20174
16 20163
17 20173
18 20143
19
Judgement Swapping and Aggregation.
20122
20 20162

About Aidan Lyon

Aidan Lyon is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Decision Sciences, Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 25 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (179 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (15 citations), General Decision Sciences (21 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations) and Philosophy (60 citations). Aidan Lyon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark Colyvan, Mark A. Burgman, Eric Pacuit, Bonnie C. Wintle, Michael Morreau, Fiona Fidler, Marissa F. McBride, Louisa Flander, Charles Twardy and Brian J. Manning. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Diversity and Distributions, Journal of Business Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact