Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

17.4k citations
306 papers · · active since 2018

Impact in

Papers in

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

268 papers receiving 16.9k citations

Peers

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.6k
  • General Decision Sciences 432
  • General Psychology 295
  • Information Systems and Management 1.3k
Replace Methodology with:
Methodology United States
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology United States
Health Psychology Review United Kingdom
European Review of Social Psychology United States
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior United States
Research in Organizational Behavior United States
Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives United States
Journal of Mixed Methods Research United States
Practical assessment, research & evaluation United States
Journal of social behavior and personality United States
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science relative to Methodology United States Methodology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×24.6×
Methodology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

About Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

The 306 papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science in the last decades have received a total of 17.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science usually cover Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (80 papers), Statistics and Probability (113 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 papers), General Decision Sciences (9 papers) and Information Systems and Management (25 papers) specifically the topics of Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (77 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (76 papers), Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (56 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (32 papers), Research Data Management Practices (28 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (25 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (16 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science are Daniel J. Ozer, David C. Funder, Julia M. Rohrer, Daniël Lakens, John K. Kruschke, Anne M. Scheel, Violet Aurora Brown, David B. Flora, Peder Mortvedt Isager and Jessica Kay Flake.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact