Nature Human Behaviour

1.4k papers and 53.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Nature Human Behaviour in the last decades have received a total of 53.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Human Behaviour usually cover Sociology and Political Science (381 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (369 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (182 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (107 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (97 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Human Behaviour are Andrew K Przybylski, Amy Orben, Louis Tay, Ed Diener, Shigehiro Oishi, Terrie E. Moffitt, Molly J. Crockett, Cornelia Betsch, Anna Petherick and Thomas Hale.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Human Behaviour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Human Behaviour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Human Behaviour.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Human Behaviour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Human Behaviour. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Human Behaviour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Human Behaviour more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025