F. Lane

26 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

F. Lane
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Library and Information Sciences 6
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Marketing 35
  • Education 108
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
Replace Dirk Sikkel with:
Dirk Sikkel Netherlands
Abu Yazid Abu Bakar Malaysia
Yujin Kim United States
Rebecca J. White United States
Yurou Kong China
Xiaoyuan Chu China
Rowena Ortiz‐Walters United States
Ángel Barrasa Spain
Yilin Andre Wang United States
Connie Deng Canada
F. Lane relative to Dirk Sikkel Netherlands Dirk Sikkel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Dirk Sikkel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Lane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Lane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Lane. The network helps show where F. Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside F. Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Lane Line = papers co-authored together F. Lane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201667
2 201667
3 201243
4 201437
5 201926
6 201125
7 202024
8 201719
9 201117
10 202010
11 20178
12 20197
13 20157
14
Differences between Traditional, Transfer, and Online College Students: Measurement Invariance of the University Attachment Scale.
20126
15 20164
16 20174
17 20174
18 20133
19 20193
20 20203

About F. Lane

F. Lane is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Research Studies (7 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (4 papers), School Choice and Performance (4 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (3 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (3 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (6 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Marketing (35 citations), Education (108 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations). F. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kamden K. Strunk, Robin K. Henson, Hyunju Shin, Alexander E. Ellinger, Yen M. To, Kyna Shelley, Linda Reichwein Zientek, Prathiba Natesan, M. David Miller and Timothy Victor Rasinski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, Educational Psychology, Journal of Further and Higher Education and The Journal of Educational Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact