F. Lane

24 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

F. Lane
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
  • Marketing 33
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Library and Information Sciences 5
  • Safety Research 27
Replace Abu Yazid Abu Bakar with:
Abu Yazid Abu Bakar Malaysia
Fatih Orçan Türkiye
Ángel Barrasa Spain
Vivek H. Patil United States
Joseph Marks United Kingdom
Adam Kay Australia
Yurou Kong China
Xiaoyuan Chu China
Jan Francis‐Smythe United Kingdom
Malcolm King United Kingdom
F. Lane relative to Abu Yazid Abu Bakar Malaysia Abu Yazid Abu Bakar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Abu Yazid Abu Bakar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Lane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Lane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Lane. The network helps show where F. Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside F. Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Lane Line = papers co-authored together F. Lane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201666
2 201660
3 201236
4 201435
5 202023
6 201922
7 201122
8 201117
9 201716
10 20178
11 20207
12 20155
13 20195
14 20174
15
Differences between Traditional, Transfer, and Online College Students: Measurement Invariance of the University Attachment Scale.
20124
16 20164
17 20193
18 20173
19 20232
20 20202

About F. Lane

F. Lane is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 26 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Research Studies (7 papers), School Choice and Performance (4 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (4 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (3 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (3 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers) and Mathematics Education and Programs (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations), Marketing (33 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Library and Information Sciences (5 citations) and Safety Research (27 citations). F. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kamden K. Strunk, Robin K. Henson, Alexander E. Ellinger, Hyunju Shin, Yen M. To, Kyna Shelley, Prathiba Natesan, Linda Reichwein Zientek, Chase Young and Timothy V. Rasinski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, Educational Psychology, Journal of college student development and Library & Information Science Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact