F. De Meyer

27 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers

F. De Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Biological Psychiatry 52
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 68
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 106
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 151
  • Clinical Psychology 230
Replace Julien Vaucher with:
Julien Vaucher Switzerland
Samuel E. Jones United Kingdom
William J. Meggs United States
Nandu Goswami Austria
Kam-Pui Lee Hong Kong
Roger McCarter United States
John W. Scanlon United States
D. Peeters Belgium
Klas Svensson Sweden
Brian Goodman United States
F. De Meyer relative to Julien Vaucher Switzerland Julien Vaucher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Julien Vaucher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. De Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. De Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. De Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. De Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. De Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. De Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. De Meyer. The network helps show where F. De Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. De Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. De Meyer Line = papers co-authored together F. De Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997188
2 1993173
3 1994118
4 199484
5 198080
6 199369
7 199554
8 199447
9 199740
10 199824
11 200323
12 198121
13 199020
14 198718
15
Relationships of climatic data to immune and hematologic variables in normal human.
200017
16 199315
17 199214
18 19876
19 19844
20 19903

About F. De Meyer

F. De Meyer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Oceanography, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (6 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (5 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (5 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (4 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (2 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (52 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (68 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (106 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (151 citations) and Clinical Psychology (230 citations). F. De Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Maes, D. Peeters, Paul Cosyns, Simon Scharpé, Peter D'Hondt, Herbert Y. Meltzer, L. Van Der Auwera, Diana M. Hendrickx, Herbert Y. Meltzer and Hugo Neels. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Biometeorology, Solar Physics, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and Clinical Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact