F. De Meyer

28 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

F. De Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Biological Psychiatry 42
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 55
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 88
  • Clinical Psychology 216
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 113
Replace Julien Vaucher with:
Julien Vaucher Switzerland
John W. Scanlon United States
William J. Meggs United States
Toshio Ishikawa Japan
Lianne M. Kurina United States
Brian Goodman United States
Nandu Goswami Austria
Hawley Kunz United States
Nicholas M. Greene United States
D. Peeters Belgium
F. De Meyer relative to Julien Vaucher Switzerland Julien Vaucher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Julien Vaucher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. De Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. De Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. De Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. De Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. De Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. De Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. De Meyer. The network helps show where F. De Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. De Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. De Meyer Line = papers co-authored together F. De Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997201
2 1993175
3 1994121
4 199488
5 198084
6 199371
7 199554
8 199447
9 199743
10 199825
11 200323
12 198122
13 199020
14 198718
15
Relationships of climatic data to immune and hematologic variables in normal human.
200017
16 199316
17 199214
18 19876
19 19746
20 19844

About F. De Meyer

F. De Meyer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Molecular Biology and Physiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (6 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (6 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (5 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (4 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (3 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers) and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (42 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (55 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (216 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (113 citations). F. De Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Maes, D. Peeters, Paul Cosyns, Simon Scharpé, Peter D'Hondt, Herbert Y. Meltzer, L. Van Der Auwera, Diana M. Hendrickx, Herbert Y. Meltzer and Hugo Neels. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Biometeorology, Solar Physics, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Clinical Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact