Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

862.8k citations
30.5k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • RNA modifications and cancer
    • RNA Research and Splicing
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
    • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
    • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Papers in

    • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 1.1k
    • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 890
    • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 649
    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 606
    • Ion channel regulation and function 569

Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

28.4k papers receiving 799.8k citations

Peers

Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
  • Molecular Biology 375.3k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 88.7k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 25.1k
  • Cell Biology 63.8k
  • Cancer Research 52.1k
Replace American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology with:
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology United States
Cell Reports United States
eLife United States
Human Molecular Genetics United States
The FASEB Journal United States
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences United States
Circulation Research United States
Advances in experimental medicine and biology United States
Biochemical Pharmacology United States
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology United States
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences relative to American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology United States American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

About Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

The 30.5k papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 862.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.4k papers), Molecular Biology (12.3k papers), Cell Biology (2.5k papers), Biochemistry (1.1k papers) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (879 papers) specifically the topics of Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1.1k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (890 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (688 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (664 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (663 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (649 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (606 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (569 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences are Ferruccio Ritossa, David Read, William Mike Howell, Bernd Bukau, Matthias P. Mayer, Takuya Suzuki, Alicia Llorente, Nina Pettersen Hessvik, Geoffrey Burnstock and Johan H. Auwerx.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact