Emma Wright
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Mental Health Research Topics
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 1
-
- Treatment of Major Depression 2
- Co-authors
- Andrew A. Nierenberg (2 shared papers)Jonathan E. Alpert (3 shared papers)J F Rosenbaum (1 shared paper)Meridith A. Rankin (1 shared paper)Joel A. Pava (1 shared paper)Maurizio Fava (1 shared paper)Maurizio Fava (2 shared papers)Shamsah B. Sonawalla (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Colorectal Disease (1 paper)Psychiatry Research (1 paper)Psychological Medicine (1 paper)Anaesthesia (1 paper)Comprehensive Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emma Wright
8 papers receiving 622 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Biological Psychiatry 37
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 176
- Behavioral Neuroscience 31
- Clinical Psychology 181
- Psychiatry and Mental health 118
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Wright. The network helps show where Emma Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Emma Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 269 | |
| 2 | Evolution of remission as the new standard in the treatment of depression. | 1999 | 141 |
| 3 | 2002 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 74 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 8 | Using the Omnibus Survey to test questions on emigration. | 2007 | 5 |
| 9 | 2020 | 0 |
About Emma Wright
Emma Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (37 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (176 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (31 citations), Clinical Psychology (181 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (118 citations). Emma Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrew A. Nierenberg, Jonathan E. Alpert, J F Rosenbaum, Meridith A. Rankin, Joel A. Pava, Maurizio Fava, Maurizio Fava, Andrew A. Nierenberg, Shamsah B. Sonawalla and John J. Worthington. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Psychiatry Research, Psychological Medicine, Anaesthesia and Comprehensive Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.