Emma Wright
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Mental Health Research Topics
Papers in
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 1
-
- Treatment of Major Depression 2
- Co-authors
- Andrew A. Nierenberg (2 shared papers)Jonathan E. Alpert (3 shared papers)Meridith A. Rankin (1 shared paper)J F Rosenbaum (1 shared paper)Maurizio Fava (1 shared paper)Joel A. Pava (1 shared paper)Maurizio Fava (2 shared papers)Jerrold F. Rosenbaum (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Colorectal Disease (1 paper)Anaesthesia (1 paper)Comprehensive Psychiatry (1 paper)Psychological Medicine (1 paper)Psychiatry Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emma Wright
8 papers receiving 599 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Biological Psychiatry 55
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 246
- Behavioral Neuroscience 43
- Psychiatry and Mental health 180
- Clinical Psychology 231
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Wright. The network helps show where Emma Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Emma Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 260 | |
| 2 | Evolution of remission as the new standard in the treatment of depression. | 1999 | 135 |
| 3 | 2002 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 8 | Using the Omnibus Survey to test questions on emigration. | 2007 | 4 |
| 9 | 2020 | 0 |
About Emma Wright
Emma Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (1 paper) and Abdominal Surgery and Complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (55 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (246 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (43 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (180 citations) and Clinical Psychology (231 citations). Emma Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew A. Nierenberg, Jonathan E. Alpert, Meridith A. Rankin, J F Rosenbaum, Maurizio Fava, Joel A. Pava, Andrew A. Nierenberg, Maurizio Fava, Jerrold F. Rosenbaum and Shamsah B. Sonawalla. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Anaesthesia, Comprehensive Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.