Mark Vella

24 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Mark Vella
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Urology 40
  • Rheumatology 64
  • Toxicology 14
  • Oncology 54
  • Surgery 103
Replace Stacey L. Amorosi with:
Stacey L. Amorosi United States
Anders Carlstedt Sweden
Chobufo Muchi Ditah United States
Franco Alessandri Italy
Hasan Onur Topçu Türkiye
Casey Quinlan Norway
Carolina Álvarez United States
Mohamed Fahmy Egypt
Davide Lijoi Italy
Trustin Domes Canada
Mark Vella relative to Stacey L. Amorosi United States Stacey L. Amorosi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Stacey L. Amorosi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Vella

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Vella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Vella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Vella more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Vella

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Vella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Vella. The network helps show where Mark Vella may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Vella, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Vella Line = papers co-authored together Mark Vella links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200349
2 201938
3 200732
4 201229
5 201727
6 200225
7 201320
8 200318
9 201517
10 201617
11 200916
12 200912
13 201212
14 20078
15 20137
16 20025
17 20225
18 20074
19
New developments in the management of urinary incontinence.
20052
20
New developments in the treatment of urinary incontinence.
20062

About Mark Vella

Mark Vella is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Urology, Oncology, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (10 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (4 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (3 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), Abdominal Surgery and Complications (2 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (40 citations), Rheumatology (64 citations), Toxicology (14 citations), Oncology (54 citations) and Surgery (103 citations). Mark Vella has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include David Galloway, Richard G. Molloy, Susan Joan Moug, Emma Wright, Heleni Mastoroudes, Maya Basu, Patricia Connolly, Ilias Giarenis, Hanadi Kazkaz and Sushma Srikrishna. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, International Urogynecology Journal, International Journal of Surgery, The Lancet and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact