Emma Černis

1.7k citations
42 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Černis

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Emma Černis
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 623
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 304
  • Philosophy 181
  • Applied Psychology 60
  • Clinical Psychology 248
Replace Anton B. P. Staring with:
Anton B. P. Staring Netherlands
Thomas Ward United Kingdom
Ji‐Won Hur South Korea
Miriam Fornells‐Ambrojo United Kingdom
Nynke Boonstra Netherlands
Frank Röhricht United Kingdom
Jason Holden United States
Björn Schlier Germany
Charlotte E. Wittekind Germany
Roos Pot-Kolder Netherlands
Emma Černis relative to Anton B. P. Staring Netherlands Anton B. P. Staring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Anton B. P. Staring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Černis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Černis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Černis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Černis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Černis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Černis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Černis. The network helps show where Emma Černis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Černis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Černis Line = papers co-authored together Emma Černis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015195
2 2016158
3 201490
4 201349
5 201448
6 202048
7 201346
8 201944
9 201436
10 201634
11 201634
12 201926
13 202025
14 202123
15 201922
16 201519
17 202218
18 202317
19 201516
20 202013

About Emma Černis

Emma Černis is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (15 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (623 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (304 citations), Philosophy (181 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations) and Clinical Psychology (248 citations). Emma Černis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Freeman, Graham Dunn, Katherine Pugh, Gail Wingham, Jacinta Cordwell, David Kingdon, Helen Startup, Nicole Evans, Anke Ehlers and Felicity Waite. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Psychological Medicine, PLoS ONE and British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact