Helen Mander

741 citations
12 papers · 433 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Helen Mander

12 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

Helen Mander
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 228
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
  • Philosophy 88
  • Clinical Psychology 98
  • Applied Psychology 15
Replace Francesca Bohn with:
Francesca Bohn Germany
Jacinta Cordwell United Kingdom
Susana Sierra‐Baigrie Spain
Yulia Landa United States
Geneviève Sauvé Canada
Helena García‐Mieres Spain
Ian Lowens United Kingdom
Joshua A. Tiegreen United States
David A. Lynch United States
Martina Brandizzi Italy
Helen Mander relative to Francesca Bohn Germany Francesca Bohn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Francesca Bohn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Mander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Mander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Mander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Mander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Mander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Mander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Mander. The network helps show where Helen Mander may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Mander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Mander Line = papers co-authored together Helen Mander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2015195
2 200965
3 201448
4 201634
5 200921
6 201519
7 201515
8 201014
9 201410
10 20148
11 20053
12
An explanatory randomised controlled trial testing the effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for worry on persecutory delusions in psychosis: the Worry Intervention Trial (WIT)
20151

About Helen Mander

Helen Mander is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (228 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (124 citations), Philosophy (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (98 citations) and Applied Psychology (15 citations). Helen Mander has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Zambia. Frequent co-authors include David Kingdon, Katherine Pugh, Gail Wingham, Jacinta Cordwell, Graham Dunn, Helen Startup, Emma Černis, Daniel Freeman, Adele Ring and Tony Kendrick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiology, Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Health Technology Assessment, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Journal of Human Rights Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact