Chiara Causier

746 citations
7 papers · 397 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Chiara Causier

7 papers receiving 381 citations

Chiara Causier's Hit Papers

Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England 2020 · 341 citations
3410+2+4Years since publication100200300

Peers

Chiara Causier
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Health 207
  • Modeling and Simulation 33
  • Sociology and Political Science 241
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 98
  • Clinical Psychology 101
Replace Emily Bold with:
Emily Bold United Kingdom
Tarek Bellaj Qatar
Angelo Fasce Portugal
Natalie M. Brousseau United States
Irena Pavela Banai Croatia
Alessandra Tasso Italy
Gaëlle Marinthe France
Cheng‐Fang Yen Taiwan
Gabriel Andrade United Arab Emirates
Ayokunle Olagoke United States
Chiara Causier relative to Emily Bold United Kingdom Emily Bold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Emily Bold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chiara Causier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chiara Causier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chiara Causier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chiara Causier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chiara Causier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chiara Causier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chiara Causier. The network helps show where Chiara Causier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Chiara Causier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chiara Causier Line = papers co-authored together Chiara Causier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
Hit paper breakdown →
2020341
2 201943
3 20198
4 20242
5 20241
6 20241
7 20241

About Chiara Causier

Chiara Causier is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Misinformation and Its Impacts (1 paper), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (1 paper) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (207 citations), Modeling and Simulation (33 citations), Sociology and Political Science (241 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (98 citations) and Clinical Psychology (101 citations). Chiara Causier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Felicity Waite, Emily Bold, Daniel Freeman, Emma Černis, Louise Isham, Jessica C. Bird, Kathryn M. Taylor, Eleanor Chadwick, Nicola Collett and Paul M. Šalkovskis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Early Intervention in Psychiatry, BJPsych Open and Comprehensive Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact