Emily Bold
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Modeling and Simulation top 10%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 5
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 3
-
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 2
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 2
- Co-authors
- Felicity Waite (7 shared papers)Chiara Causier (3 shared papers)Daniel Freeman (7 shared papers)Eleanor Chadwick (6 shared papers)Nicola Collett (6 shared papers)Emma Černis (4 shared papers)Louise Isham (3 shared papers)Jessica C. Bird (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BJPsych Open (2 papers)Schizophrenia Bulletin (1 paper)Mental health and physical activity (1 paper)Psychiatry Research (1 paper)Comprehensive Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily Bold
8 papers receiving 406 citations
Emily Bold's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Health 205
- Modeling and Simulation 33
- Cognitive Neuroscience 111
- Sociology and Political Science 240
- Clinical Psychology 110
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Bold
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Bold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Bold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Bold more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Bold
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Bold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Bold. The network helps show where Emily Bold may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Emily Bold, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 341 |
| 2 | 2019 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 |
About Emily Bold
Emily Bold is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 8 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (205 citations), Modeling and Simulation (33 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations), Sociology and Political Science (240 citations) and Clinical Psychology (110 citations). Emily Bold has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Felicity Waite, Chiara Causier, Daniel Freeman, Eleanor Chadwick, Nicola Collett, Emma Černis, Louise Isham, Jessica C. Bird, Kathryn M. Taylor and Louise Johns. Their work appears in journals such as BJPsych Open, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Mental health and physical activity, Psychiatry Research and Comprehensive Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.