Emma Blakey

877 citations
24 papers · 518 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Blakey

18 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Emma Blakey
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 181
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 213
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 129
  • Statistics and Probability 59
  • Sensory Systems 29
Replace Karolina Urton with:
Karolina Urton Germany
Adam Oei Singapore
Laura Franchin Italy
Liat Goldfarb Israel
María Teresa Daza Spain
Elena Cañadas Spain
Nai‐Shing Yen Taiwan
María Rosa Elosúa de Juan Spain
Marie Izaute France
Nicola K. Ferdinand Germany
Emma Blakey relative to Karolina Urton Germany Karolina Urton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Karolina Urton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Blakey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Blakey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Blakey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Blakey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Blakey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Blakey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Blakey. The network helps show where Emma Blakey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Blakey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Blakey Line = papers co-authored together Emma Blakey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018173
2 201578
3 201559
4 202038
5 202028
6 201624
7 202317
8 201817
9 202016
10 202116
11 201914
12 202311
13 20229
14 20176
15 20204
16 20214
17 20253
18 20251
19 20250
20 20250

About Emma Blakey

Emma Blakey is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability, having authored 24 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Early Childhood Education and Development (7 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (181 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (213 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (129 citations), Statistics and Probability (59 citations) and Sensory Systems (29 citations). Emma Blakey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Carroll, Giulia Poerio, Tom Hostler, Ingmar Visser, David A. Lagnado, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack, Marc J. Buehner, Lily FitzGibbon and Ana B. Vivas. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Educational Psychology Review and npj Science of Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact