E.M. Savage
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 1%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Livestock and Poultry Management
- Food Science top 5%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Papers in
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 20
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 19
- Food Science 13
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 12
- Co-authors
- Hong Zhuang (15 shared papers)B.G. LYON (8 shared papers)C.E. LYON (4 shared papers)D.P. Smith (4 shared papers)William R. Windham (2 shared papers)M.E. Berrang (2 shared papers)S.O. Nelson (1 shared paper)Samir Trabelsi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Poultry Science (12 papers)Journal of Food Science (2 papers)Cereal Chemistry (1 paper)LWT (1 paper)The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
E.M. Savage
24 papers receiving 578 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Animal Science and Zoology 505
- Food Science 190
- Analytical Chemistry 99
- Nutrition and Dietetics 80
- Insect Science 41
Countries citing papers authored by E.M. Savage
This map shows the geographic impact of E.M. Savage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.M. Savage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.M. Savage more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.M. Savage
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.M. Savage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.M. Savage. The network helps show where E.M. Savage may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside E.M. Savage, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 3 |
About E.M. Savage
E.M. Savage is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biotechnology and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 24 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (20 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (19 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (12 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers), Food composition and properties (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (505 citations), Food Science (190 citations), Analytical Chemistry (99 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (80 citations) and Insect Science (41 citations). E.M. Savage has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hong Zhuang, B.G. LYON, C.E. LYON, D.P. Smith, William R. Windham, M.E. Berrang, S.O. Nelson, Samir Trabelsi, Ruthann B. Swanson and Sandra E. Kays. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Journal of Food Science, Cereal Chemistry, LWT and The Journal of Applied Poultry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.