Eleni Chambers

883 citations
19 papers · 531 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Eleni Chambers

19 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Eleni Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Occupational Therapy 31
  • Clinical Psychology 135
  • Applied Psychology 23
  • General Health Professions 109
  • Social Psychology 76
Replace Ana Soto‐Rubio with:
Ana Soto‐Rubio Spain
Rodrigo Sanches Peres Brazil
Margaret Coffey United Kingdom
Jess Feist United States
Ana Bártolo Portugal
Pat Dorsett Australia
Melanie Chapman United Kingdom
María Ángela Mattar Yunes Brazil
Belinda Lewis Australia
Rene Geanellos Australia
Eleni Chambers relative to Ana Soto‐Rubio Spain Ana Soto‐Rubio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Ana Soto‐Rubio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eleni Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eleni Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eleni Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eleni Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eleni Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eleni Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eleni Chambers. The network helps show where Eleni Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eleni Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eleni Chambers Line = papers co-authored together Eleni Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009130
2 201961
3 201950
4 200841
5 201538
6 201737
7 198936
8 201226
9 201122
10 200918
11
An evaluation of a new service model: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies demonstration sites 2006-2009, Final Report.
201117
12 201912
13
Developing measures for effective service user and carer participation
200710
14 20099
15 20139
16 20105
17 20244
18 20223
19 20163

About Eleni Chambers

Eleni Chambers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Clinical Psychology, Occupational Therapy and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper) and Disability Rights and Representation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (31 citations), Clinical Psychology (135 citations), Applied Psychology (23 citations), General Health Professions (109 citations) and Social Psychology (76 citations). Eleni Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Cook, Glenys Parry, Peter Allmark, Andrew R. Thompson, Jonathan Boote, Amanda Clarke, Angela Tod, Ann McDonnell, Jane Seymour and Gillian E. Hardy. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Psychotherapy Research, Frontiers in Public Health and Disability & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact