BMJ Quality & Safety

1.8k papers and 67.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in BMJ Quality & Safety in the last decades have received a total of 67.1k indexed citations. Papers published in BMJ Quality & Safety usually cover General Health Professions (698 papers), Emergency Medical Services (597 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (349 papers) specifically the topics of Patient Safety and Medication Errors (526 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (287 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (226 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMJ Quality & Safety are Mark L. Graber, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Hardeep Singh, Frank Davidoff, Peter J. Pronovost, Paul B. Batalden, Eric J. Thomas, Greg Ogrinc, Carl Macrae and Charles Vincent.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMJ Quality & Safety

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMJ Quality & Safety. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMJ Quality & Safety.

Countries where authors publish in BMJ Quality & Safety

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMJ Quality & Safety. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMJ Quality & Safety with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMJ Quality & Safety more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025